Yes. I have public posts. But think of all the stuff you're missing by not telling me you exist and want to be my friend. Sign my guestbook and say "hullo".
If you are already a friend, you are already on the readership list. Thank you for your patronage. Пожалуйста объявите здесь, чтобы быть добавленными к моему списку друзей. Вы будете моим другом?
...and tell me why you think that is a good idea.
If you just "friend" me, it is not likely that I will see that for a long time. If I don't know you, I likely won't be making it mutual since you didn't introduce yourself.
If you do not have a Live Journal account, then get one
. They are free and LJ won't spam you.
If you simply wish to comment on a post anonymously, you don't have to have an account for that.
Мои российские языковые навыки ужасны, между прочим.Create your own visitor map!
Sign the guestbook
Gender equality is fraught with issues. Men and women really
. Given the actual physical differences
, beyond primary and secondary sexual characteristics between men and women, is it even possible to have equality? This, in no way, means there should be a gender separation between gender neutral careers such as engineering, airline pilot, astronaut, bank CEO, food service, nursing, and so forth. Perhaps equality is not something we should be striving for, but parity.
by the Orthodox Church in America sums it up nicely, though it is a discussion that is faith specific.
"...Equality suggests some sort of steamrollering process of equivalence. It does away with any mutual fulfillment, and creates the conditions for conflicts. At any given moment, either side can replace the other and render them redundant. Parity, on the other hand, demands respect for differences as well as recognition of the special value and gifts of men and women. ..."
Equality denies our gender differences and uncomfortably and contentiously forces all into the same mold. Equality makes no account for our differences and calls shame on those same. Gender equality is intolerant. Parity, on the other hand, celebrates the differences and special abilities attributed to gender and can maximize the potential of the person.
Finagle's First Law:
To study a subject best, understand it thoroughly before you start.
Finagle's Second Law:
No matter what the anticipated result, there will always be
someone eager to (a) misinterpret it, (b) fake it, or (c) believe it
happened according to his own pet theory.
Finagle's Third Law:
In any collection of data, the figure most obviously correct,
beyond all need of checking, is the mistake
Finagle's Third Law Corollaries:
(1) Nobody whom you ask for help will see it.
(2) The first person who stops by, whose advice you really
don't want to hear, will see it immediately.
Finagle's Fourth Law:
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it only makes
Finagle's Fifth Law:
Always draw your curves, then plot your readings.
Finagle's Sixth Law:
Don't believe in miracles -- rely on them.
There was a loud anguished cry from a cube a few feet away from me. Clearly someone just had some bad news. Perhaps they lost some important work to their computer's bit bucket. The anguished groan grew louder and didn't stop.
There is something wrong. That is not normal. I went to investigate. A coworker, newly hired by the company, a kid, was on the floor face down, his chair on its side and he in it, unconscious and moaning. Other coworkers came to aid.
We removed the chair and other objects that would prevent, or slow down, medical staff from helping him. Someone called 911 and corporate security. I contacted my supervisor to notify him of what had happened so he could contact the coworker's supervisor.
The man eventually came to. He was very disoriented and a bit panicky. We tried to calm him and get him to lie still. Security came and soon after the fire department. There was nothing more I could do, so I went back to work.
The man was carted off to the hospital. He is 24 years old. I pray it is nothing serious and is a one-off event. This was not a good way to end the day, for anyone.
I was up late last night. Very late. I found myself on a bridge over a busy highway in a bad part of town at one point at 2:00am, when reasonable people are in bed. When I had completed my task I started walking back to my car. A sketchily dressed man was walking in front of me. He was clothed in drooping pants, a t-shirt, and another shirt draped over his shoulder. My Hawaiian shirt and clean cut appearance screamed "outsider!" He never looked back. He most probably saw me well before I saw him. I wondered if he was just coming back from a bar or if he was a gang member or just general hoodlum. He kept walking. I got in my truck and drove off without incident.
After I had slept some, I awoke with the thought that maybe he HAD to dress that way to be respected in his community. Maybe he is really a nice guy getting off his late work shift and he was attired in that manner so the bad people would think he was also dangerous and respect him enough not to bother him.
When did we, as a society, start thinking fear was respect? No one respects terror. Fear is tyranny, but is most certainly not the same thing as respect. People used to dress like that man and were dismissed as unimportant. They were bums. They were not respected. Then something happened and the bums became violent and feared. Now, that is the fashion. Fear as fashion to gain respect. The two are not equal. I see people dressed as gangsters and I don't respect them. They look like humanities's garbage. I don't have respect, but I do have fear of them. It is not possible to tell the good from the bad, anymore. (Let's not bring our politicians into this - we are discussing street thugs).
The Holy Bible tells us that we should "fear" the Lord. But if you STUDY your Bible and not just read it, you would understand that the use of the word "fear" is not conveying a sense of tyranny. It conveys a sense of awe and wonderment.
From www.hebrew4christians.com :
The word translated "fear" in many versions of the Bible comes from the Hebrew word yirah (יִרְאָה), which has a range of meaning in the Scriptures. Sometimes it refers to the fear we feel in anticipation of some danger or pain, but it can also can mean "awe" or "reverence." In this latter sense, yirah includes the idea of wonder, amazement, mystery, astonishment, gratitude, admiration, and even worship (like the feeling you get when gazing from the edge of the Grand Canyon). The "fear of the LORD" therefore includes an overwhelming sense of the glory, worth, and beauty of the One True God.
Some of the sages link the word yirah (יִרְאָה) with the word for seeing (רָאָה). When we really see life as it is, we will be filled with wonder and awe over the glory of it all. Every bush will be aflame with the Presence of God and the ground we walk upon shall suddenly be perceived as holy (Exod. 3:2-5). Nothing will seem small, trivial, or insignificant. In this sense, "fear and trembling" (φόβοv καὶ τρόμοv) before the LORD is a description of the inner awareness of the sanctity of life itself (Psalm 2:11, Phil. 2:12).
From biblehub.com :
Cognate: 2317 theosébeia – properly, God-fearing (veneration); godly respect, reverence (used only in 1 Tim 2:10). See 2318 (theosebēs).
You can see from both the Hebrew use of "fear" and Greek use of "fear" that the fear we are to have of God is not the type that conveys tyranny or threat of suffering. It is respect.
There is a great need for end-to-end encryption for ALL communications. Your aunt Edna's bunions may not be high on the list of things that you may think require encryption, but that is not the point. You are not a criminal so have nothing to hide is also not the point. The point is that no matter how banal, how mundane, vapid or trite a topic is, IT IS NO ONE'S BUSINESS BUT YOURS and the people you are sharing it with.
Look into PGP, AES, VPN, OTR (used for instant message), snail mail, and other techniques for sharing your data and communication. The phone apps are out there, too, but we ALL must use them and we must use them every time.
Use of encryption makes you look suspicious? Worry less about what your government thinks of you and soon your government will begin to worry more about what you think of it. Encryption is not suspicious if EVERYONE is using it for everything.
"Policing is only easy in a police state." ~Austin Hill
German researchers discover a flaw that could let anyone listen to your cell calls.
"When we think that God's law is His way of robbing us of pleasure we are no different from little kids who identify sin with getting into trouble. As we mature in faith we should begin to see more clearly the rational basis for divine commandments. As this happens we begin to see the Lord's instructions as delightful aids to health, happiness and the kind of pleasure that lasts." ~Hieromonk Maximos, "Psalm 16: Pleasures for Evermore", Theosis, November 2014, Vol. 3, Number 3, pg 40.
"God's rules are there to indicate the limit beyond we have turned away from him and hurt or broken communion with him. In other words, God's commands serve our communion with him." ~Father Michael Lee, "Christianity: rules or relationship?"
I went to confession on Saturday like a good Catholic should. After confession I went to buy groceries. My cart was full of groceries and I had four dollars in my pocket. A woman with a child in her arms accosted me. "Excuse me, I am really embarrassed to ask but my boyfriend and I just had an argument. He kicked me out and I am trying to get to Phoenix...", pleaded the woman.
I gave her a compassionate look and interrupted her, "I am sorry. I'm so sorry."
She looked away and I moved on, loaded my groceries in my car, and left. I felt nothing for her. She didn't register. Other panhandlers have registered with me. I once bought a cup of coffee for a man who was clearly a meth addict. I gave $20 to a homeless man one night who was asking for money for a hotel. There have been numerous other cases. I give generously to organizations that exist for the express purpose to help people in need. This woman didn't register with me and it bothered me that she didn't. Whether or not she was legitimate was one her. Here was a person asking for help and I knowingly refused for some reason.
I went to Divine Liturgy the next morning. I am sexton for my church and stayed after to help stuff envelopes for the upcoming bake sale and perform other duties (as assigned). The other parishioners had left and I used the opportunity to discuss the situation with my pastor. The discussion went on for some two and a half hours. He was a bit animated since he hadn't had a discussion like this since seminary many years ago.
It comes down to being moved by the Holy Spirit. This is something to be wary about since it has most certainly been abused as an excuse to do what one wishes. I was not moved to help this woman. We discussed the possible reasons why.
She crossed a "barrier"; I was at a vulnerable moment. Her story had many holes in it: Does she really have no local friends or family that could help? There's no bus between my town and the one she wanted to go to. She'd never be able to raise the money for a taxi ride that far. Why didn't she go to a church for help? What about the baby?
Yes. The baby. It took us an hour to reach this point:
1) REPHRASE THE NARRATIVE
2) ALTER THE PARADIGM
First point: "I have made very bad decisions in my life. I am reduced to begging and thus have put my infant child in danger. Please help."
Second point: The CHILD needs help. I must call Child Protective Services. They can investigate the situation and find out if she is running from an abusive situation and get her REAL help.
I now know what to do. I can have compassion and TRULY help people while filtering out those who just want a handout. Cash is not the help most beggars really need. They need to be given the tools to elevate themselves out of their situation (I have a plan for that as well). I just need to rephrase the narrative and alter the paradigm.
These two techniques work on other situations as well, especially in politics.
While I was peacefully and quietly going about my life, the Universe did a paradigm shift.
The device tested by NASA was not efficient but was intended to only demonstrate a principle. NASA does not even appear to know how it works. Mind you, this will not produce enough thrust to leave the planet, but it would be very useful for orbital correction or deep space missions.
Every rocket engine design to date has been a reaction engine: fuel in, exhaust out. This engine, seemingly against the known laws of physics, has removed the penalties associated with those two things.
The questions of "why does it work" and "can it be scaled up" need to be answered, now.Go build your own
Looking for the "right gal", gentlemen? If you found one you think you'd like to marry, then you had better think again before you do. If she falls into one of the following categories, then you should seriously examine your relationship. You might want to leave her, immediately. Likely, she will have one or more or these traits, regardless of who you choose. Most women exhibit these several of these traits at various times. However, if she falls solidly into these extremes, then it may be better to run away.13 Women Men Should Never Marry